Rogerian argument paper examples
Rogerian argument papers are analytical essays that use the Rogerian model of rhetorical analysis to evaluate and critique an argument by examining its structure, style, and effectiveness. These papers typically present a position on a contentious topic, analyze the arguments presented by both sides of an issue, and arrive at a conclusion that reflects the writer's evaluation of the arguments.
One example of a Rogerian argument paper is a critique of a political speech given by a presidential candidate. The paper would begin by outlining the key themes and arguments of the speech, including the candidate's proposal for new policies, his positions on social issues, and his plans for the future. The writer would then analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the candidate's arguments by evaluating the evidence presented, the logic of the argument, and the effectiveness of the delivery.
The paper would also discuss potential counterarguments and how the candidate could respond to them. Finally, the writer would conclude the paper by stating whether the candidate's argument was strong, weak, or mixed, and why.
Another example of a Rogerian argument paper is a review of a book on climate change. The paper would start by summarizing the main arguments and findings of the book, including the author's thesis, supporting evidence, and conclusions. The writer would then analyze the reliability of the author's sources and the strengths and weaknesses of the book's arguments.
