non verbal vs non speaking
The debate between 'non-verbal' and 'non-speaking' is a continuingly evolving conversation within the disability rights movement. These two terms describe distinct aspects of communication differences among individuals with disabilities, each with its own set of nuances and historical contexts.
The Basics of Non-verbal Communication
non-verbal communication refers to the acts, symbols, and habits that occur without an individual's use of spoken words. This includes body language, facial expressions, eye contact, gestures, posture, and tone of voice, among others. Non-verbal communication is often cited as making up 90% of how we communicate, indicating its significance in conveying messages.
The Rise of Non-speaking
in non-speaking has gained popularity within the last decade as a less stigmatizing alternative to 'non-verbal'. This term refers to individuals who use alternative methods of communication, such as sign language or low-tech augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices, to express themselves. Non-speaking individuals are capable of learning to use these tools, which can increase their participation in social interactions and communication.
The Need for Accurate Labeling
However, some advocates argue that the term 'non-speaking' can be perceived as disrespectful or inaccurate, as it implies that individuals with disabilities are limited in their ability to communicate. They prefer the term 'nonspeaking', which they argue is a more factual and respectful description of the communication needs of individuals with disabilities.
Changing Attitudes
The rise of social media and online forums has provided a space for discussions about non-verbal communication to flourish, fostering a more open and inclusive dialogue about individuals with disabilities' communication needs. This conversation has led to movements to move away from general labels like 'low-functioning' and 'high-functioning' and towards a more personalized, strengths-based approach to describing the communication abilities of individuals with disabilities.
Communicating Effectively
In order to fully include non-speaking individuals in community settings, it is essential to recognize their communication preferences and provide them with the necessary tools and support to communicate effectively. This may include access to sign language interpreters, AAC devices, or other assistive technologies. Additionally, providing non-speaking individuals with the time and space to communicate their thoughts and feelings is crucial to ensuring that their communication is acknowledged as valid.
###The ongoing debate between 'non-verbal' and 'non-speaking' reflects a broader societal shift towards recognizing and respecting the communication needs of individuals with disabilities. By embracing these terms and striving to understand and support an individual's preferred method of communication, we can create communities that are more inclusive and supportive of all individuals, regardless of their communication abilities.
Works Cited
- riggs, corrina m.a., slp-ccc. "Nonspeaking vs. nonverbal and why language matters." an ask the expert column. american speech-language-hearing association, 2023., the debate between 'non-verbal' and 'non-speaking' remains a critical aspect of understanding the diverse communication needs of individuals with disabilities. By recognizing these terms and advocating for appropriate support and accessibility, we can work towards creating more inclusive and supported communities for people with disabilities.